Before You Automate Another Process, Ask These Questions

Introduction

Automation has become one of the most powerful tools available to modern businesses.

Organizations are automating everything from invoice approvals and employee onboarding to customer communications, reporting, and marketing campaigns. Artificial intelligence is accelerating this trend even further, allowing businesses to streamline repetitive tasks and accomplish more with fewer manual processes.

The benefits are undeniable. Automation improves efficiency, reduces administrative work, and helps organizations scale without increasing operational complexity at the same pace.

But there is one important consideration that often receives far less attention.

Automation doesn’t just make good processes more efficient: It does the same for bad ones, too.

Every Automated Process Deserves a Second Look

When organizations automate a workflow, they typically focus on one question:

“How can we make this faster?”

It’s an important objective, but it shouldn’t be the only one. A better question might be:

“Are we automating a process we actually trust?”

If a workflow contains unnecessary permissions, weak approval procedures, or inconsistent data handling, automation can unintentionally amplify those issues. Rather than introducing new risk, automation often exposes risks that already existed but were previously limited by manual oversight.

In other words, automation rarely creates poor processes. It reveals them.

Small Gaps Can Scale Quickly

Consider a business that automates vendor invoice approvals.

If the approval rules are well designed, the result is greater efficiency and fewer delays. However, if approval thresholds are unclear or verification steps have been skipped, the organization may simply process mistakes or fraudulent requests more quickly than before.

The same principle applies across many areas of the business. Automated workflows often involve:

Each workflow moves information from one system to another. Understanding who has access, what data is being shared, and how decisions are made becomes increasingly important as automation expands.

Visibility Becomes Even More Important

One challenge many organizations encounter is that automated processes gradually become invisible.

Once a workflow has been configured, it often runs quietly in the background for months or years. Teams become accustomed to it working reliably and rarely revisit how it was originally designed. Meanwhile, the business continues to evolve: Employees change roles, and new software is introduced. Departments grow, and data moves between additional platforms.

An automated workflow that made perfect sense two years ago may no longer reflect how the organization operates today. Without periodic reviews or security assessments, automation can quietly drift away from current business practices.

Automation and AI Are Changing the Conversation

The rapid adoption of AI-powered business tools is accelerating automation across nearly every department. Many platforms can now summarize documents, generate reports, classify information, respond to customer inquiries, or trigger actions automatically.

These capabilities offer tremendous opportunities, but they also reinforce the need for strong governance.

Organizations should understand:

  • What information AI tools can access.
  • What actions automated workflows are allowed to perform.
  • Who is responsible for reviewing those processes over time.

According to guidance from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, organizations should approach AI implementation with governance, oversight, and risk management built into the process—not added afterward.

Building Secure Automation

Businesses don’t need to slow innovation to reduce risk.

In fact, a few simple practices can significantly improve both operational efficiency and security:

  • Review workflows before automating them.
  • Limit access to only those who need it.
  • Regularly review permissions and integrations.
  • Document how automated processes work.
  • Periodically evaluate whether workflows still reflect current business operations.

The objective isn’t to automate less. It’s to automate with intention.

Final Perspective

Automation is helping businesses work faster than ever before, and that trend will only continue.

The organizations that benefit most, however, won’t simply be the ones that automate the most processes. They’ll be the ones that understand how those processes affect security, governance, and operational resilience over time.

At Secutor, we help organizations evaluate new technologies, automated workflows, and operational processes through a business-first cybersecurity lens. By identifying risks before they become embedded in day-to-day operations, we help businesses embrace innovation while maintaining the visibility and governance needed to support long-term growth.

Because automation should make your business more efficient. It should also make it more resilient.

Connect with an Expert for a Free Consultation

Secutor is your team of world-class problem solvers with vast expertise and experience delivering complete solutions keeping your organization protected, audit-ready, and running smoothly. Use the form below to contact us for a free consultation.

Enjoyed this Content?

Share this story on social media!

Andersen Consulting
Scroll to Top

Jason Fruge

Consulting Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)

Jason Fruge is an accomplished Consulting Chief Information Security Officer at Secutor Cybersecurity, bringing over 25 years of deep expertise in information security. His storied career includes leading and managing robust security programs for Fortune 500 companies across retail, banking, and fintech sectors. His current role involves providing strategic guidance and advisory services to clients, focusing on security governance, risk management, and compliance.

Apart from his consulting responsibilities, Jason is an active member of the global cybersecurity community. He is a Villager at Team8, a prestigious collective of senior cybersecurity executives and thought leaders. Additionally, he serves as an Advisor at NightDragon, an innovative growth and venture capital firm specializing in cybersecurity and enterprise technologies.

Jason’s tenure as a CISO is marked by a proven track record in developing and implementing comprehensive security policies and procedures. He adeptly leverages security frameworks and industry best practices to mitigate risks, safeguarding sensitive data and assets. His expertise encompasses incident response and root cause analysis, where he has notably managed cyber incidents to prevent breaches and minimize business disruption and customer impact.

A key aspect of Jason’s role has been the creation and facilitation of executive and board-level cyber risk committees, ensuring organizational alignment and awareness. His responsibilities have extended to maintaining compliance programs for standards such as PCI and SOX, as well as leading privacy and business continuity programs. Holding prestigious certifications like CISSP, QSA, and QTE, Jason is also a recognized thought leader, contributing articles on cybersecurity to InformationWeek.

Jason’s passion lies in driving innovation and fostering collaboration in the cybersecurity field. He is currently seeking an executive CISO role in a leading retail, finance, or fintech organization, where he can continue to make significant contributions to the cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk

Cybersecurity Risk Management Expert

Jennifer Bayuk is a highly esteemed cybersecurity risk management thought leader and subject matter expert at Secutor Cybersecurity. Her extensive experience encompasses managing and measuring large-scale cybersecurity programs, system security architecture, and a wide array of cybersecurity tools and techniques. Jennifer’s expertise is further deepened with her proficiency in cybersecurity forensics, the audit of information systems and networks, and technology control processes.

Jennifer’s skill set is comprehensive, including specialization in cybersecurity risk and performance indicators, technology risk awareness education, risk management training curriculum, and system security research. Her academic achievements are noteworthy, holding Masters degrees in Philosophy and Computer Science, and a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering. This strong academic background provides a solid foundation for her practical and strategic approach to cybersecurity challenges.

Certified in Information Systems Audit, Information Systems Security, Information Security Management, and IT Governance, Jennifer is a well-rounded professional in the field. Her credentials are further enhanced by her license as a New Jersey Private Investigator, adding a unique dimension to her cybersecurity expertise.

At Secutor, Jennifer plays a pivotal role in steering cybersecurity initiatives, aligning them with organizational risk appetites and strategic objectives. Her ability to educate and train in the realm of technology risk has been instrumental in raising awareness and enhancing the cybersecurity posture of our clients. Her dedication to research and continual learning makes her an invaluable resource in navigating the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk’s blend of academic prowess, practical experience, and certifications make her an indispensable part of our team, as she continues to drive forward-thinking cybersecurity solutions and risk management strategies.

Steve Blanding

CISO Consultant

CISSP, CISA, CGEIT, CRISC

Steve is an IT management consultant living in Dallas, TX. Steve has over 35 years of experience in executive IT leadership, IT governance, risk and compliance (GRC), systems auditing, quality assurance, information security, and business resumption planning for large corporations in the Big-4 professional services, financial services, manufacturing, retail electronics, and defense contract industries. He has extensive experience with industry best practices for adopting and implementing new technologies, IT service management frameworks, and GRC solutions that have dramatically improved customer satisfaction while reducing cost.

Industry Experience

  • State Government: 5 years
  • Retail: 5 years
  • Defense Contract: 5 years
  • Manufacturing: 2 years
  • Health Care: 2 years
  • Local Government: 2 years
  • Public Accounting (Big 4): 7 years
  • Insurance: 3 years
  • Financial Services: 5 years

Key Career Accomplishments

  • Conducted a full-scale ISO27000 audit 4 times over the past 6 years.  Also, conducted a “light” ISO27000 review of a small Dallas-based company in 2007.
  • Developed and authored a comprehensive IT security policy manual, incident response plans, training programs, security contingency plans and configuration management plans for FedRAMP regulatory compliance.
  • Conducted multiple DR and operational backup and recovery IT risk assessments of critical business systems on mainframe, LAN, and distributed system networks located across North America.
  • Conducted data centers audits for Tyco Corporation (Brussels, 2005 and Denver, 2006), Farmers Insurance (Los Angeles, 2006), Zurich Financial Services (Chicago, Kansas City, and Grand Rapids, 2006), and Convergys Corporation (Dallas, 2010, 2011, and 2012).
  • Led a project to remediate segregation of duties and streamline user access system security and HIPAA compliance administration across 5 regions in North America, resulting in cost savings of $700,000 per year (Kaiser Permanente).
  • Implemented Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 and 404 IT general and application controls, reducing security administration costs and improving operational performance by 50% or $500,000 annually (Tyco Corporation).
  • Led the global SAP business-IT alignment, process re-design implementation initiative for financial accounting, materials management, production planning, quality management, sales and distribution, warehouse management, and plant maintenance, which resulted in creating $2,000,000 in cost savings.
  • Engaged by Arthur Andersen in Houston to transform the local IT organization and then direct 3 organizational mergers/consolidations, which resulted in a 25% reduction in operating costs, or $3,250,000, while improving customer satisfaction by 30%, and improving employee morale, technology availability and the quality of IT infrastructure and service delivery.
  • Assigned by Arthur Andersen global leadership to lead global project teams responsible for data center and customer support call center consolidation, which resulted in annual operational cost savings of 45% or $4,000,000.
  • Implemented ITIL service management practices for problem management, incident management, help desk, project management, and operations management.
  • Conducted SOX 404 audits at Duke Energy (6 months), Red Hat (3 months), Tyco (9 months), Zeon Chemicals (4 months), and Convergys (2 months). Experience includes control design/documentation and effectiveness testing.

Publications:

Author, various articles in EDPACS and Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 1981 – 2001

Author, various articles in the Handbook of Information Security Management, 1993 – 1995

Editor, Auerbach’s Enterprise Operations Management, 2002

Editor, Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 2000 – 2002

Consulting Editor, Auerbach’s EOM Portfolio Series, 1998 -2001

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Reach out using the form below, and we’ll contact you as soon as possible to schedule your consultation.

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Use the form to schedule a consultation, and we’ll reach out within 48 hours to confirm the appointment.

Considering this delay, please only select meeting dates 48 hours or more in advance. Your information will only be used to facilitate a meeting.