Fractional CISO, MSP, or Full-Time Hire: Which Does Your Business Actually Need?

Introduction

There’s a specific moment when this question arrives:
A customer sends a security questionnaire nobody can answer. An insurer asks about controls you’re not certain you have. A board member wants to know who owns cyber risk, and the honest answer is that several people own pieces of it and nobody owns the whole thing.

What’s become clear is that “our IT provider handles it” no longer covers the situation. What’s equally clear is that hiring a security executive feels wildly out of proportion to the size of the business.

That gap is where most mid-market companies sit, and it’s an uncomfortable place because the advice available tends to come from people selling one of the options. So let’s compare all three plainly: what each one is actually built to do, when one is the right call, and the arrangement most businesses in that gap end up choosing.

They're Not Competing for the Same Job

The most common mistake in this decision is treating these as three answers to one question. They aren’t.

A managed service provider operates your technology. A CISO, fractional or full-time, decides what your technology should be doing and why. One is execution, the other is judgment, and a business can have excellent execution of a strategy nobody ever set.

Once you separate those two functions, the comparison gets much easier, because you can ask which one you’re actually missing.

What an MSP Is Built to Do

MSPs get unfairly criticized in security conversations, usually by people selling security services, so let’s clear things up.

A good MSP keeps your business running. Systems stay patched, backups complete, the helpdesk answers, new employees get provisioned, and the network stays up. That work is genuinely difficult, it matters enormously, and a business with a strong MSP relationship has something valuable.

Many MSPs also sell security products: endpoint detection, email filtering, multi-factor authentication, perhaps monitoring. These are real controls and they provide real protection.

What the model doesn’t typically include is accountability for security strategy. The MSP’s contract is usually written around availability and response times, which means their incentive is a stable environment rather than a defensible risk posture. Those overlap substantially, but they’re not identical, and the difference shows up in the places nobody is measuring. Nothing in an uptime commitment requires anyone to ask whether your highest-value data is protected differently from everything else, whether your controls would satisfy a specific regulation, or whether the security products on your invoice are the ones your actual exposure calls for.

That’s not an MSP shortcoming. It’s a scope question, and the trouble starts when a business assumes the scope is wider than it is.

What a Fractional CISO Adds

A fractional CISO supplies the decision layer. Not the hands on keyboards, but the judgment about what should be built, in what order, and at what cost.

In practice that means setting a security roadmap tied to what the business is actually trying to accomplish, deciding which risks get mitigated and which get accepted on purpose, translating technical exposure into terms a board or an insurer can act on, and evaluating what vendors and providers propose before you buy it. The last one matters more than it sounds, because somebody should be reviewing security recommendations who doesn’t earn money on the purchase.

It also means somebody owns the answer when a customer sends that questionnaire, when regulators change the rules underneath you, or when leadership needs to discuss cyber risk alongside everything else on the agenda.

The engagement is typically structured around a regular cadence rather than a fixed number of hours. Secutor’s program, for instance, runs from twice-yearly strategy sessions at the entry level up to monthly sessions with tabletop exercises and executive reporting support at the top tier, which lets a business start at the level of involvement it genuinely needs.

When a Full-Time Hire Is the Right Call

Sometimes it is, and it’s worth clearing the air about when.

A full-time CISO makes sense when security work is continuous rather than periodic: you have a security team to lead, regulatory obligations that generate ongoing work, a complex environment changing constantly, or customers whose contracts require a named security executive. If there’s genuinely forty hours a week of security leadership to do, splitting it part-time will frustrate everyone involved.

The constraint is cost, and it’s substantial. Compensation surveys put CISO pay somewhere between roughly $320,000 and $385,000 depending on the source, with an often-cited average near $350,000 before benefits, recruiting, or equity. Mid-market roles sit below the headline enterprise figures, but the full commitment still lands well into six figures.

The harder problem is fit. Experienced security executives want scope, budget, and a team. A business that can’t offer those tends to struggle to attract good candidates and then struggles to keep the ones it does attract.

The Arrangement Most Businesses Land On

For a large share of mid-market companies the answer isn’t one of the three. It’s two of them.

The MSP runs the environment. The fractional CISO decides what the environment should look like, reviews what the MSP recommends, and owns the risk conversation with leadership, customers, and insurers. Each party does the work it’s structured to do well, and the business gets execution and judgment without paying for a full-time executive it can’t yet keep busy.

This is common enough that we run a white-label program specifically made for MSPs so they can offer fractional CISO services to their own clients. 

Final Perspective

The question worth asking isn’t which option is best. It’s which function your business is currently missing.

If nobody is operating your technology reliably, you need an MSP. If your technology is well run but no one can tell you whether it’s protecting the right things for the right reasons, you need a CISO, and whether that’s part-time or full-time comes down to how much of that work there genuinely is.

At Secutor, our Fractional CISO program exists for the businesses sitting in the gap. If you’re trying to work out which of the three you need, we’re happy to talk it through, including when the answer isn’t us.

Connect with an Expert for a Free Consultation

Secutor is your team of world-class problem solvers with vast expertise and experience delivering complete solutions keeping your organization protected, audit-ready, and running smoothly. Use the form below to contact us for a free consultation.

Enjoyed this Content?

Share this story on social media!

Scroll to Top

Jason Fruge

Consulting Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)

Jason Fruge is an accomplished Consulting Chief Information Security Officer at Secutor Cybersecurity, bringing over 25 years of deep expertise in information security. His storied career includes leading and managing robust security programs for Fortune 500 companies across retail, banking, and fintech sectors. His current role involves providing strategic guidance and advisory services to clients, focusing on security governance, risk management, and compliance.

Apart from his consulting responsibilities, Jason is an active member of the global cybersecurity community. He is a Villager at Team8, a prestigious collective of senior cybersecurity executives and thought leaders. Additionally, he serves as an Advisor at NightDragon, an innovative growth and venture capital firm specializing in cybersecurity and enterprise technologies.

Jason’s tenure as a CISO is marked by a proven track record in developing and implementing comprehensive security policies and procedures. He adeptly leverages security frameworks and industry best practices to mitigate risks, safeguarding sensitive data and assets. His expertise encompasses incident response and root cause analysis, where he has notably managed cyber incidents to prevent breaches and minimize business disruption and customer impact.

A key aspect of Jason’s role has been the creation and facilitation of executive and board-level cyber risk committees, ensuring organizational alignment and awareness. His responsibilities have extended to maintaining compliance programs for standards such as PCI and SOX, as well as leading privacy and business continuity programs. Holding prestigious certifications like CISSP, QSA, and QTE, Jason is also a recognized thought leader, contributing articles on cybersecurity to InformationWeek.

Jason’s passion lies in driving innovation and fostering collaboration in the cybersecurity field. He is currently seeking an executive CISO role in a leading retail, finance, or fintech organization, where he can continue to make significant contributions to the cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk

Cybersecurity Risk Management Expert

Jennifer Bayuk is a highly esteemed cybersecurity risk management thought leader and subject matter expert at Secutor Cybersecurity. Her extensive experience encompasses managing and measuring large-scale cybersecurity programs, system security architecture, and a wide array of cybersecurity tools and techniques. Jennifer’s expertise is further deepened with her proficiency in cybersecurity forensics, the audit of information systems and networks, and technology control processes.

Jennifer’s skill set is comprehensive, including specialization in cybersecurity risk and performance indicators, technology risk awareness education, risk management training curriculum, and system security research. Her academic achievements are noteworthy, holding Masters degrees in Philosophy and Computer Science, and a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering. This strong academic background provides a solid foundation for her practical and strategic approach to cybersecurity challenges.

Certified in Information Systems Audit, Information Systems Security, Information Security Management, and IT Governance, Jennifer is a well-rounded professional in the field. Her credentials are further enhanced by her license as a New Jersey Private Investigator, adding a unique dimension to her cybersecurity expertise.

At Secutor, Jennifer plays a pivotal role in steering cybersecurity initiatives, aligning them with organizational risk appetites and strategic objectives. Her ability to educate and train in the realm of technology risk has been instrumental in raising awareness and enhancing the cybersecurity posture of our clients. Her dedication to research and continual learning makes her an invaluable resource in navigating the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk’s blend of academic prowess, practical experience, and certifications make her an indispensable part of our team, as she continues to drive forward-thinking cybersecurity solutions and risk management strategies.

Steve Blanding

CISO Consultant

CISSP, CISA, CGEIT, CRISC

Steve is an IT management consultant living in Dallas, TX. Steve has over 35 years of experience in executive IT leadership, IT governance, risk and compliance (GRC), systems auditing, quality assurance, information security, and business resumption planning for large corporations in the Big-4 professional services, financial services, manufacturing, retail electronics, and defense contract industries. He has extensive experience with industry best practices for adopting and implementing new technologies, IT service management frameworks, and GRC solutions that have dramatically improved customer satisfaction while reducing cost.

Industry Experience

  • State Government: 5 years
  • Retail: 5 years
  • Defense Contract: 5 years
  • Manufacturing: 2 years
  • Health Care: 2 years
  • Local Government: 2 years
  • Public Accounting (Big 4): 7 years
  • Insurance: 3 years
  • Financial Services: 5 years

Key Career Accomplishments

  • Conducted a full-scale ISO27000 audit 4 times over the past 6 years.  Also, conducted a “light” ISO27000 review of a small Dallas-based company in 2007.
  • Developed and authored a comprehensive IT security policy manual, incident response plans, training programs, security contingency plans and configuration management plans for FedRAMP regulatory compliance.
  • Conducted multiple DR and operational backup and recovery IT risk assessments of critical business systems on mainframe, LAN, and distributed system networks located across North America.
  • Conducted data centers audits for Tyco Corporation (Brussels, 2005 and Denver, 2006), Farmers Insurance (Los Angeles, 2006), Zurich Financial Services (Chicago, Kansas City, and Grand Rapids, 2006), and Convergys Corporation (Dallas, 2010, 2011, and 2012).
  • Led a project to remediate segregation of duties and streamline user access system security and HIPAA compliance administration across 5 regions in North America, resulting in cost savings of $700,000 per year (Kaiser Permanente).
  • Implemented Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 and 404 IT general and application controls, reducing security administration costs and improving operational performance by 50% or $500,000 annually (Tyco Corporation).
  • Led the global SAP business-IT alignment, process re-design implementation initiative for financial accounting, materials management, production planning, quality management, sales and distribution, warehouse management, and plant maintenance, which resulted in creating $2,000,000 in cost savings.
  • Engaged by Arthur Andersen in Houston to transform the local IT organization and then direct 3 organizational mergers/consolidations, which resulted in a 25% reduction in operating costs, or $3,250,000, while improving customer satisfaction by 30%, and improving employee morale, technology availability and the quality of IT infrastructure and service delivery.
  • Assigned by Arthur Andersen global leadership to lead global project teams responsible for data center and customer support call center consolidation, which resulted in annual operational cost savings of 45% or $4,000,000.
  • Implemented ITIL service management practices for problem management, incident management, help desk, project management, and operations management.
  • Conducted SOX 404 audits at Duke Energy (6 months), Red Hat (3 months), Tyco (9 months), Zeon Chemicals (4 months), and Convergys (2 months). Experience includes control design/documentation and effectiveness testing.

Publications:

Author, various articles in EDPACS and Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 1981 – 2001

Author, various articles in the Handbook of Information Security Management, 1993 – 1995

Editor, Auerbach’s Enterprise Operations Management, 2002

Editor, Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 2000 – 2002

Consulting Editor, Auerbach’s EOM Portfolio Series, 1998 -2001

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Reach out using the form below, and we’ll contact you as soon as possible to schedule your consultation.

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Use the form to schedule a consultation, and we’ll reach out within 48 hours to confirm the appointment.

Considering this delay, please only select meeting dates 48 hours or more in advance. Your information will only be used to facilitate a meeting.