How to Have an Effective Vulnerability Management Process

Introduction

If you are going to do something, you may as well do it right. A poorly designed and constructed vulnerability management program is essentially like having no program at all. Why spend the time, money, and resources putting together a program that won’t meet or exceed the expectations you have in place for it? The more effort you put into setting up your vulnerability management program now, the less time you will have to allocate towards dealing with errors and potentially successful attacks by cyber thieves because you’ll have a sustainable security process.

Vulnerabilities can come in many different forms. Anything from breaches, defacements, loss of data, privacy issues, etc. are all common problems that organizations face when they don’t have an effective program. So, what are the characteristics of a great vulnerability management program?

The Importance of Remediation

We will start out by bringing to light arguably the most important part of an effective vulnerability management program. As you may be able to guess, this is the remediation process. You can have the best program up to this point, but if you don’t actually spend the time and necessary money to fix the problems that you discover then everything before this step is essentially useless. Improving the overall security of your organization’s systems is the end goal for any vulnerability management program. The remediation process will not be the same for every problem that the system scanning uncovers. The type of risk, the severity of the risk, and where the risk lives all help determine the necessary steps that need to be taken to get the problem resolved.

An important piece to finish off the remediation process is to rescan the system in order to ensure your fix was effective. One of the last things you want to do is fall under the impression that you have eliminated the risk while it is still secretly lurking in the shadows.

Sustainability and Repeatability

Vulnerability management programs are not a tool that you use once and then forget about it. If you truly want to get the most out of your program, then regular assessments of your systems are necessary. With the fast-paced advancement of technology, cybersecurity, and hacker’s skill sets, the importance of continuous threat scanning has never been greater. Discovering these threats, hazards, and weaknesses in a timely manner can be the difference between your organization spending a reasonable amount of time and money to fix them, or your system offline for weeks on end while you fork over hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to repel the invaders and get things back up and secure again. Recovering from attacks such as ransomware and breaches can cause damages other than just those of monetary value. Recovering from a breach can include sending notifications, paying for credit monitoring services, reputation damage, and fines. A recent study that can be found here shows that the average cost incurred by a business per lost or stolen data record containing personally identifiable information (PII) ranges from $146 to $175. This same study also found that 8 out of every 10 attacks specifically targeted PII. 

Intro to Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)

Once all systems have been scanned, a comprehensive vulnerability management program will assess the risks found and determine the severity of each vulnerability. Common Vulnerability Scoring Systems (CVSS) provides organizations with a way to classify the field of vulnerabilities so that everyone is talking about them with numbers instead of descriptors. For example, 1-10 instead of medium or highly severe. This eliminates the chance of a company not applying appropriate risk levels to vulnerabilities because of a lack of appropriate context. Properly prioritizing the risks in an order of greatest to smallest threat is how a great program will help determine which issues need to be addressed first. However, it is important to keep in mind that risks can come from anywhere. Desktop environments, power users, and admins are all susceptible to vulnerabilities just like specifically targeted servers. Attackers will frequently jump from different systems in order to get to their final target. This is where CVSS shines. CVSS provides context that includes base metrics, impact, temporal factors, and environmental factors. At the end of the day, you don’t want to be spending a great chunk of your time fixing issues that have no real threat to your organization while a vulnerability that’s a larger threat goes untouched in the background. 

Program Best Practices

So what are some things that you should be sure to avoid when putting your vulnerability management program to use? Many vulnerability management programs fail because there is no structure to the process as a whole. Rather than creating goals and following policies, many teams simply view the program as less important than operational IT concerns with no justified purpose. A lack of cohesion between security teams and IT teams is a recipe for failure when it comes to your vulnerability management program. One goal should be to avoid issues where the IT team is blaming the security team for not doing their job or vice versa. If the different teams within your organization can’t act as a whole, then don’t expect your program to run at its full capability.

Oftentimes one of the biggest mistakes an organization can make is not prioritizing the discovered vulnerabilities in order of highest to lowest risk using CVSS. It is so easy to do, but yet it can turn out to be an extremely costly mistake. Prioritizing low-risk vulnerabilities over far more threatening problems has proven to be the downfall of many organizations. Another huge mistake is the failure to act during the remediation stage. Although vulnerability scanning is a huge aspect of the process as a whole, if you don’t proactively act to fix the uncovered problems then your security will never see any type of improvement. It doesn’t matter how many times you scan for vulnerabilities. The real enhancement of the system’s security comes in the remediation stage. Lastly, many programs fail to look at systemic ways of reducing their threat profile. For example, standardizing on a limited number of specific technologies like databases and operating systems, maintaining current versions and patches, disabling unessential services, reducing trust relationships, and implementing network segmentation. 

Risk Mitigation

With that said, it is also extremely important to understand when it is worth it to fix a problem and when it is simply to accept the risk and not act. As organizations and individuals rely more and more on technology, it is not unheard of to uncover thousands of vulnerabilities in a single week. Realistically it is impossible to fix this many problems in a timely manner. This goes back to the need for prioritizing the vulnerabilities so you know which ones pose the greatest threat. Many times organizations come to the conclusion that the less important issues are better to leave untouched. When companies make this decision it is more than likely because it would be more expensive to fix the problem than it would be to leave it and have it suffer a breach. Along with this, company leaders sometimes determine that the loss in revenue due to the time it would take to turn a system offline, get the problem fixed, and then get everything back up and running is far greater than it would be if the vulnerability was exposed.

Stay the Course

One last scenario that is a common mistake for vulnerability management programs is relying too much on headlines you see in the news. It sounds funny, but it is definitely not unheard of to have bosses or CEO’s come into the office worried about a new breach or vulnerability that was on the news the night before. Naturally, they will want to make the remediation of those vulnerabilities a top priority. However, that is actually one of the worst things your organization can do. Dropping everything to fix these types of issues can cause your team to miss critical vulnerabilities that actually pose a real threat to your organization’s online systems. Not all companies and their respective systems are the same, so just because one organization experiences a major vulnerability within their systems does not necessarily mean that yours will face the same threat. A great vulnerability management program will discover what the real threats are during the scanning and prioritizing stages of the process.

Asset Inventory Considerations

We would be remiss if we didn’t talk about the importance of asset inventories where vulnerability management is concerned. Knowing what needs to be protected is a huge part of an effective vulnerability management program. A top-tier program provides the organization with the appropriate tools that can be used to uncover security weaknesses and threats to the systems the company thrives on. If you are unsure where the greatest security threats live within your systems, then your vulnerability management program will lack the ability to protect what is most important. It’s important to understand where your organization’s risks live and which systems process, store, and transmit that information. In order to protect information, you must understand what needs to be protected and where it lives. Not all data is or should be considered equal and requires specific controls appropriate to its classification.

Conclusion

As you can see, the vulnerability management process can become quite complex over time. However, taking the time to understand which systems are most at risk, running scans on a consistent basis, and remediating problems as they arise are some of the best things that you and your organization can do to ensure you are making the most of your vulnerability management program.  

About Secutor

Secutor Cybersecurity is a trusted partner comprised of industry leading experts in the fields of Cybersecurity and Governance, Risk and Compliance. We partner with our clients to deliver on-demand solutions tailored to expertly navigate the regulatory demands of their specific industries.

Our proven track record of successfully exceeding client expectations is achieved through the combination of our methodical approach, advanced technologies, subject matter experts, and synergy with client team members.

Secutor is your team of world-class problem solvers with vast expertise and experience delivering complete solutions keeping your organization protected, audit-ready, and running smoothly.

Scroll to Top

Jason Fruge

Consulting Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)

Jason Fruge is an accomplished Consulting Chief Information Security Officer at Secutor Cybersecurity, bringing over 25 years of deep expertise in information security. His storied career includes leading and managing robust security programs for Fortune 500 companies across retail, banking, and fintech sectors. His current role involves providing strategic guidance and advisory services to clients, focusing on security governance, risk management, and compliance.

Apart from his consulting responsibilities, Jason is an active member of the global cybersecurity community. He is a Villager at Team8, a prestigious collective of senior cybersecurity executives and thought leaders. Additionally, he serves as an Advisor at NightDragon, an innovative growth and venture capital firm specializing in cybersecurity and enterprise technologies.

Jason’s tenure as a CISO is marked by a proven track record in developing and implementing comprehensive security policies and procedures. He adeptly leverages security frameworks and industry best practices to mitigate risks, safeguarding sensitive data and assets. His expertise encompasses incident response and root cause analysis, where he has notably managed cyber incidents to prevent breaches and minimize business disruption and customer impact.

A key aspect of Jason’s role has been the creation and facilitation of executive and board-level cyber risk committees, ensuring organizational alignment and awareness. His responsibilities have extended to maintaining compliance programs for standards such as PCI and SOX, as well as leading privacy and business continuity programs. Holding prestigious certifications like CISSP, QSA, and QTE, Jason is also a recognized thought leader, contributing articles on cybersecurity to InformationWeek.

Jason’s passion lies in driving innovation and fostering collaboration in the cybersecurity field. He is currently seeking an executive CISO role in a leading retail, finance, or fintech organization, where he can continue to make significant contributions to the cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk

Cybersecurity Risk Management Expert

Jennifer Bayuk is a highly esteemed cybersecurity risk management thought leader and subject matter expert at Secutor Cybersecurity. Her extensive experience encompasses managing and measuring large-scale cybersecurity programs, system security architecture, and a wide array of cybersecurity tools and techniques. Jennifer’s expertise is further deepened with her proficiency in cybersecurity forensics, the audit of information systems and networks, and technology control processes.

Jennifer’s skill set is comprehensive, including specialization in cybersecurity risk and performance indicators, technology risk awareness education, risk management training curriculum, and system security research. Her academic achievements are noteworthy, holding Masters degrees in Philosophy and Computer Science, and a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering. This strong academic background provides a solid foundation for her practical and strategic approach to cybersecurity challenges.

Certified in Information Systems Audit, Information Systems Security, Information Security Management, and IT Governance, Jennifer is a well-rounded professional in the field. Her credentials are further enhanced by her license as a New Jersey Private Investigator, adding a unique dimension to her cybersecurity expertise.

At Secutor, Jennifer plays a pivotal role in steering cybersecurity initiatives, aligning them with organizational risk appetites and strategic objectives. Her ability to educate and train in the realm of technology risk has been instrumental in raising awareness and enhancing the cybersecurity posture of our clients. Her dedication to research and continual learning makes her an invaluable resource in navigating the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

Jennifer Bayuk’s blend of academic prowess, practical experience, and certifications make her an indispensable part of our team, as she continues to drive forward-thinking cybersecurity solutions and risk management strategies.

Steve Blanding

CISO Consultant

CISSP, CISA, CGEIT, CRISC

Steve is an IT management consultant living in Dallas, TX. Steve has over 35 years of experience in executive IT leadership, IT governance, risk and compliance (GRC), systems auditing, quality assurance, information security, and business resumption planning for large corporations in the Big-4 professional services, financial services, manufacturing, retail electronics, and defense contract industries. He has extensive experience with industry best practices for adopting and implementing new technologies, IT service management frameworks, and GRC solutions that have dramatically improved customer satisfaction while reducing cost.

Industry Experience

  • State Government: 5 years
  • Retail: 5 years
  • Defense Contract: 5 years
  • Manufacturing: 2 years
  • Health Care: 2 years
  • Local Government: 2 years
  • Public Accounting (Big 4): 7 years
  • Insurance: 3 years
  • Financial Services: 5 years

Key Career Accomplishments

  • Conducted a full-scale ISO27000 audit 4 times over the past 6 years.  Also, conducted a “light” ISO27000 review of a small Dallas-based company in 2007.
  • Developed and authored a comprehensive IT security policy manual, incident response plans, training programs, security contingency plans and configuration management plans for FedRAMP regulatory compliance.
  • Conducted multiple DR and operational backup and recovery IT risk assessments of critical business systems on mainframe, LAN, and distributed system networks located across North America.
  • Conducted data centers audits for Tyco Corporation (Brussels, 2005 and Denver, 2006), Farmers Insurance (Los Angeles, 2006), Zurich Financial Services (Chicago, Kansas City, and Grand Rapids, 2006), and Convergys Corporation (Dallas, 2010, 2011, and 2012).
  • Led a project to remediate segregation of duties and streamline user access system security and HIPAA compliance administration across 5 regions in North America, resulting in cost savings of $700,000 per year (Kaiser Permanente).
  • Implemented Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 and 404 IT general and application controls, reducing security administration costs and improving operational performance by 50% or $500,000 annually (Tyco Corporation).
  • Led the global SAP business-IT alignment, process re-design implementation initiative for financial accounting, materials management, production planning, quality management, sales and distribution, warehouse management, and plant maintenance, which resulted in creating $2,000,000 in cost savings.
  • Engaged by Arthur Andersen in Houston to transform the local IT organization and then direct 3 organizational mergers/consolidations, which resulted in a 25% reduction in operating costs, or $3,250,000, while improving customer satisfaction by 30%, and improving employee morale, technology availability and the quality of IT infrastructure and service delivery.
  • Assigned by Arthur Andersen global leadership to lead global project teams responsible for data center and customer support call center consolidation, which resulted in annual operational cost savings of 45% or $4,000,000.
  • Implemented ITIL service management practices for problem management, incident management, help desk, project management, and operations management.
  • Conducted SOX 404 audits at Duke Energy (6 months), Red Hat (3 months), Tyco (9 months), Zeon Chemicals (4 months), and Convergys (2 months). Experience includes control design/documentation and effectiveness testing.

Publications:

Author, various articles in EDPACS and Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 1981 – 2001

Author, various articles in the Handbook of Information Security Management, 1993 – 1995

Editor, Auerbach’s Enterprise Operations Management, 2002

Editor, Auerbach’s IT Audit Portfolio Series, 2000 – 2002

Consulting Editor, Auerbach’s EOM Portfolio Series, 1998 -2001

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Reach out using the form below, and we’ll contact you as soon as possible to schedule your consultation.

Ready to Find Your Solution?

Use the form to schedule a consultation, and we’ll reach out within 48 hours to confirm the appointment.

Considering this delay, please only select meeting dates 48 hours or more in advance. Your information will only be used to facilitate a meeting.